Thoughts on an archive project.


 

by Elpida Karamba.

 

 

The following article refers to a project concerning the constitution of an archive of young artists. A curatorial initiative which sets various issues on curating (an alternative space), questioning as well grouping, categorising, archiving and locating practices and most importantly a project which participates in the discussions regarding the necessity and a certain ‘popularity’ of archives recently in visual arts practices (Iniva, Panchayat, Atlas Group etc). Realising that different archives have different and varied broad approaches and potential readings, the extended presentation of this specific project has a more practical, pragmatical character concentrating on the issues, problems and answers concerning methodology and decisions as those arouse in the on-going particular situation of charta project. Something which appears quite frequently in our problematic is the issue of networking which seems in a way to underline our approach regarding archives. Networking along with archive projects presented as visual art practices is the current subject of research of charta project.

 

  

 

Charta project

 

Charta project, was initiated by the author and Roula Palanta in order to create the possibility for discussion by trying to map an art scene, an area of certain art production. The project mainly concentrates on the idea of an on-going archive (Hall S., 2001) [1] , which is seen as a renewed idea of the notion of the archive.

Charta archive intends to cover the geographical area of the Balkans (countries that belong in the Balkans) and having its physical base, Greece. The objective of project Charta is to create a database, which will cover the broader field of visual art production in the area. More specifically in order to accumulate organise and support this material the project includes: a. An artists' archive which contains information and material on artists and their work from the Balkan area. At the same time it also concerns artists of Balkan origin who live and work abroad (diaspora). This material includes: cvs, images (photographs, slides and videos), texts, reference catalogues, bibliographical material etc. in an attempt to reveal and promote the current artistic production of Balkan countries. b. An index of curators of contemporary art which contains cvs and information on curators' projects and activities. The aim of this index is to facilitate communication with and between curators and to encourage collaboration.

In order to facilitate its work Charta established an internet site, which is used as Charta’s space for the storing and distribution of the relevant material. The internet space seemed as a direct way to have a quick and broad contact with the people Charta wanted to communicate and approach. The site presents the main objectives of the project (charta’s internet address is now linked with various search machines so people can visit us and become familiar with the project). The site includes the artist’s archive, an online magazine and a space for the presentation of art projects which will occur from the communication and collaborations of the people who participate in the project. It offers a member’s form and a network for an open, online communication and comments (net charta).

Charta's intention is to put its emphasis on praxis (a praxis which would circulate around a core, the archive, which focuses not on the distribution of information but on the creation of possibilities of networking). More specifically praxis refers to the different activities planned to be organised by the archive's network (curators, artists, critics, writers). A series of workshops, discussions, projects and events as well as a digital network are planned to promote cultural exchanges, social projects, exhibition and other initiatives undertaken by artists and curators.

 

 

Curating the archive

 

Following the description of the project I would like to refer more analytically to the ideas that underlined its development, concerning the archiving practice and more importantly the curatorial practice in relation to the specific area where the archive locates its activities.

 

Archiving practice:

The idea of an on-going archive suggests that it is not just a body of documentary material stored somewhere, comprising information about some past event or period which is not available elsewhere. It is a body of work that acts or proposes to interact with a living, current reality and therefore is a never-completed body.

The main idea of the project is that its material will exist to facilitate networking, the loose mapping of the area covered by the archive. The database of the archive will include artists’ names, images of their work and related references (biographical, texts on their work, information on their activities) but the main aim beyond holding an archive, is to foster contacts and collaborations. Through the archive one (artist, researcher curator etc) could get an idea of the current artistic production in the Balkans, without though the emphasis being on the distribution of information [2] . The ideal involvement with the particular archive would be for one to draw his own map, his own chart. The use future researchers will make of the existing material (the reading, mingling etc) is of particular interest for the curators of the archive who concentrate their attention on fostering potentiality.

An archive of this kind is a continuous production and as S. Hall (2001) notes it is impossible to describe such an archive in its totality. The very idea if an on-going archive contradicts the "fantasy of completeness" (Hall S, 2001). As work is produced, and networks expand it cannot be complete. The present practice immediately adds to it.

 

Curatorial practice:

The particular project concerns the exploration, mapping and presentation/promotion of material (art works, art projects, texts, information on artists etc) about contemporary art in the Balkans.

Charta project, in a way, is a familiar curatorial project in terms of collecting and presenting the material in a particular space. At the same time, though, it has the potential to offer an extended role to the curator, where the curator is a metaphor for a dj, a compilator who organises the material to generate a new entity.

 

In Charta project the curators, as expected, undertake the task of managing -potential coherences and of possible network configurations- but the main idea is to surpass mere translation and replace it by that of incorporation [3] .

As mentioned earlier the aim/role of the curators is to create a system of networking and to investigate the potentiality offered by such networks. This is an attempt to put the emphasis on networks and relationships. In most curatorial projects networking plays an important role, though, this material usually is not visible. Charta would like to investigate and draw the attention to the importance of networking, make this material visible and offer this material for interpretation.  Networks are likely to create bonds between people, artists, critics, thinkers, administrators, curators who can create, investigate/explore an art scene and penetrate in systems of art scenes. In other words networks offer the possibility to create dynamic relations. Dynamic relations leap back and forth and influence neutral relationships which consequently are expanded with an affective colouring and broader communal relations (Bismarck B., Eichele S., Feldmann H-P., e.a, 2002). The individual only exists by means of countless collectivities, with which private experiences are shared and whereby pieces of references come together in a mobile entity. In other words dynamic relations are sets of network possibilities that are defined not by their boundaries but by their many layers that fan out endlessly and thereby also make various connections. These sets of network possibilities form a platform that depends and takes into account the relationships between people and the things that surround them, which thus lead to them anew and on multi-dimensional relationships that are approached as connective possibilities that continue to expand [4] .

   

Consequently, the building of the archive is not based solely on material (which austerely describes a certain area/condition) gathered from the curators. It is rather based on contacts, relationships that the curators try to establish, with artists, curators and writers and even with people that don’t belong in the ‘art scene’ but show a broader interest in the activity (people from different disciplines, sociology, economy, politics).

 

"Locating" practice:

More specifically, in the case of the Balkans (where the particular archive project focuses its activities), the system of networking offers the possibility to have a more extended image of the art production of a specific geographical area of which we only have a fragmented image of its production. Audiences seem to be (over)familiar with some artists which are broadly promoted by the dominant system of prestigious influential institutions in the global metropolises (as for example the work of M. Abramovich, I. Kozaric), but this does not imply a clear idea of the broader environment that affects this production. Moreover this selected and fragmented image prevents one from recognising or understanding fully the role that such art scenes have in the artistic production (peripheral-local scenes as opposed to the dominant-global scenes). At the same time one does not have the tools to evaluate the impact of the dominant scenes to the production and vocabulary of the peripheral (Balkan) scene.

 

The trick would be though not to try to describe that particular scene as if it were an oeuvre, but it would be to try to describe it in terms of relations, relations between statements, relations between groups, relations between events of quite different types. To reveal in all the space in which discursive information and formations are deployed is not to undertake to re-establish it in an isolation that nothing could overcome; it is not to close it upon itself; it is to leave one free to describe, discover the interplay of relations within it and outside it [5] .

 

In that sense what initially seemed to be offered by such an archive was the chance to organise a plenitude of information in order to create a space for a dialectic discourse. The archive stands for a different sort of space from that which is constantly over-occupied and over-activated for the presentation of the visual. It articulates a space whose role is defined not only by communications but also by potential communications – by contingencies, in other words which offers a basic possibility for further expositions, criticality and investigation. In this context of an articulated dialectic space, it was clear that the specific archival process could concern other situations, areas, which shared similar characteristics.

 

The intention was not to bring forward the case of Balkans as most important or interesting than other cases. It is more an effort to propose a way of investigating, understanding and see the potentiality of creating art scenes which could add in the diversity of the art world. In this mode of proposing another way of investigation and mapping of an area this attempt is not undertaken in an elegiac way by showing the richness of the art production of the area but it also intends to draw attention to the gaps, the malfunctions and the difficulties. In that sense, the particular area was chosen as the archive was initiated by greek curators (and intends to invite curators from the Balkans to participate in the project) who are more familiar with the artistic production of the area. The curators involved (or to be involved) because they work in the area are perceptive and informed on issues of concern that inform this specific area, therefore it seemed appropriate to use it as their arena of action.

 

In other words the intention of the project was to go beyond the specific (area, artistic production etc - although specific parameters are taken into consideration for methodological purposes of collecting and archiving material eg. Balkans, visual art etc). It was clear from the beginning that the broader aim of this activity was not only the mapping of the field. The main interest of this activity is the development of the relevant material: the production of ideas, discussions and experiences, the creation of new ways of communication and collaboration within the field of contemporary art in the Balkans. In this context it is apparent the danger of any such archivisation to support/create preconceptions about the material it includes as belonging to a 'concrete group'. In the particular case the artists to be involved, included in the archive could be considered as 'ethnic artists', but this is exactly an idea the current project intends to challenge and disrupt. In this instance the grouping of artists aims to intensify the dialogue about the nature of artistic practice and to interrupt the coercion of the system into accepting a particular kind [6] of practice by certain artists, related to their origin, ethnicity etc., and in that sense this kind of charting could concern other similar situations. Therefore Charta uses the terms 'temporary groups', understanding its grouping of artists under the specificity 'Balkan' as a way to originate a dialogue which can be extended beyond Balkans.

Thus, the specific archive which deals with a specific geographical area tries to create temporary groups to oppose them to concrete groups and fixed categorisations, it creates a dialogue concerning the relationships. In the effort to create an ongoing condition rather than a closed system of information it was of particular concern for the project to be a 'subject-in-formation' [7] .

In other words what the curators will try to evaluate each time is for the project not to freeze its material as part of time and history. We will try every time to describe a group of statements so that the grouping of the archive will remain temporary and the stage of discourse not terminal. After all, the field described is not tightly-packed, is not a continuous field, it is as said earlier a field full of gaps, differences and distances. So, we will try to remain faithful to the preterminal regularities (Foucault, 2001) that describe what lies behind the completed system which reveals a group of multiple relations. We are not looking for a system that describes a specific thought or consciousness but for relations that describe levels of discourse and thus "one remains within the dimension of discourse" (Foucault, 2001). In that sense we understand that the archive could offer a space for alternative possibilities to develop.

 

 

 

 

Elpida Karaba is an independent curator

Roula Palanta is an art historian, Director of the Institute of Contemporary Arts, Larissa

Contact us on chartaarchive@hotmail.com or send your emails at e_karampa@hotmail.com



[1] an idea which the writer also encountered in the event Potential, On going Archive, organised by A. Harding in June 2002. (The event was including: a symposium (22 June 2001) and an exhibition held in John Hansard Gallery, University of Southampton (25 June-24 August 2002) and the publication of the book Potential On Going Archive, Anna Harding (ed.), 2002, Amsterdam, Artimo)

[2] the mere distribution of information is something that the current archive wished to avoid. As Adorno notes in The Culture Industry, 1991, p.82: "mere information becomes a system of signals that signals itself. In mass culture an endless bureau of information forces itself upon the hapless visitor and regales him/her with material, sparing each individual from the disgrace of appearing as stupid as everyone. "

[3] This idea is derived by the text of Bart De Baere, 2002, “Potentiality and Public Space, Archives as a Metaphor and Example for a Political Culture”, in Interarchive.   

[4] Bart De Baere, 2002, “Potentiality and Public Space, Archives as a Metaphor and Example for a Political Culture”, in Interarchive.

[5] Foucault M., 2001, The Archeology of Knowledge

[6] this refers to preconceptions in regards for example with the thematic: an artist from Yugoslavia is expected to deal with the war, or with the fall of the eastern block, and in many cases his case is considered the case of an insider, loaded both with exoticism and consent.

 

[7]   A term borrowed by I. Rogoff, , 2000, Terra Infirma, describing with this term, her book as a project too ambitious and too personally motivated (in her words), a project in which she wanted to set up an exploration of links between subjects and disciplines.